/reader

The response suggested a short bio at the top with a prominent call to action or link to Bandcamp.

Another idea was some kind of music widget with, possibly, a random track. I like the idea but would have to create a new table in the database with links to various tracks that I could randomly pull from.

Instead, I am considering a standard Bandcamp embed with the latest release. I already put embeds on /music so that's a simple cut & paste job. I might try a base embed, but have an option in the admin page for the link to the latest release. Rather than redo the home page each time I release something, I could just change the option. 🤔

One other thing Gemini proposed was to have a grid of cards for the different sections of the site: blog, music, etc. The old home page had all the links in a big 'card', so maybe I could use the same style but with each item having its own section.

I started testing a responsive CSS grid that would change the number of columns based on screen size, but haven't really worked out how I want it to look.

At least it's got me thinking and given me some ideas, which is more than I've had in weeks.

# Mucking around with a test page, I came across an issue I never realised I had on the original home page. It was something caused by my misunderstanding of how a particular PHP function worked.

It's now fixed!

As noted pretty much everywhere since the shooting occurred, a little over two years ago—on stage at a Turning Point USA event focused on faith, of all things—Kirk made it clear that he’s an idolater who believes in the necessity of human sacrifice.

I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational. Nobody talks like this. They live in a complete alternate universe.

When someone like Charlie Kirk becomes among the many who have died on his very own idolatrous altar, you’re allowed to think—or even to say aloud—“too bad, so sad”, and then just move on with your the rest of your day, and with the rest of your life.

Reply by email • Tip $1/month

Marisabel:

What’s wrong with an em-dash? It facilitates and breaks sentences for a more natural flow — a flow many other marks cannot achieve — and allows the reader to move through the pauses and thoughts of the writer. Like dancing steps, together, finding the rymth. The em-dash didn’t disappear from modern writing because it was unnecessary; it was because typewriters didn’t have space for the key — though many authors resorted to the double dash (--). But em-dashes existed long before typewriters. They made a comeback in academic and literary writing as computers replaced outdated tools.

Manu:

No you can't have them. Yes, we can still use em dashes. And no, I’m not going to stop using them because fucking chatgpt is abusing them. What if they tweak the instructions next week and tell it to use more full stops or commas? What are we gonna do then? Stop using those as well? Hell no. I’ll keep writing however I want, and if someone decides to stop reading what I write because they suspect it’s AI-generated because I use too many em dashes, or parentheses, or any other punctuation or word or whatever, well, good riddance. I’m not gonna miss you.

These are reactions to this Tadaima post, specifically, in which they surrender to the narrative and (truthfully? ironically?) vow never to use the em dash ever again.

However, after reading that Reddit thread, I now realize why people are fighting over it. People want authentic writing written by humans, not ChaptGPT. And people don't like feeling like they got "duped," so if they can look for clues to figure out if something is written by AI or a human, they're gonna use those clues.

Tadaima goes on to describe their past usage or lack thereof, of other various marks, such as the semicolon, parentheses, and Oxford comma. (Apparently, even the use of italics is supposed to be a red flag indicating a large language model.)

To use a popular construction in the em dash discourse: you can have my em dashes, my semicolons, my (sometimes nested!) parentheses, and my Oxford commas only from my cold, dead hands.

Here’s the thing, though: if you quizzed me on the proper usage of any or all of these things, I’d likely fail. Maybe if it were multiple choice I’d be okay—otherwise I’d flounder. In my writing, I use punctuation in essence to reflect and resemble how I conceive in my head the sentence would sound when spoken out loud, or in the voice of the reader’s inner monologue.

Marisabel talks about the rhythm of the words, and that’s what I focus on when I am writing. I”m pretty sure you could browse through my back catalogue here and find plenty of em dashes, semicolons, parentheses (nested, even!), and Oxford commas that are used “incorrectly”. (Well, probably not the latter; those are pretty hard to screw up.)

What matters to me when it comes to my writing is simple: is the reader understanding what I mean to say, how I meant to say it? If my thinking my way through an idea or a feeling is scattered, or breathless, or run-on, I tend to use punctuation to reflect that state of mind, regardless of what the actual rules of usage might happen to be for this or that mark.

Earlier this summer, I rewatched Inherit the Wind to mark the one-hundredth anniversary of the so-called “Scopes monkey trial”. In it, Henry Drummond—standing in for the Clarence Darrow of the real trial—defends his cursing.

I don’t swear just for the hell of it! Language is a poor enough means of communication. I think we should use all the words we’ve got. Besides, there are damn few words that anybody understands.

So, too, for our poor (and wrongly-maligned) em dash—and for all our other punctuation marks; all that matters is being understood.

Reply by email • Tip $1/month

I'm going to keep suggesting that we are all free to walk away from Apple's services. Your next computer can use GNU Linux. And before you dismiss it, have you tried it? Folks, I promise you, it is possible to have great and productive computing experience over here. The Free Software movement embraces ethical computing with a core respect for users' freedom.

I have a simple answer, which in fact I published on Mastodon as a reply. While I agree with Denny, I'd suggest to those people that a first step could be to STOP purchasing Apple's devices every year or so.

If I can manage my entire personal and work activities using a 10-year old Mac laptop, surely a sizeable percentage out there could do the same, instead of supporting Apple's unsustainable and environmentally criminal release pace.

It seriously drives me nuts, way more than a reluctance to switch to Linux, which could be understandable.

To the ones who might be thinking of a thousand justifications as to why they "need" the brightest and the best latest model of whatever bullshit Tim the Leader Dear is selling now, what I do with my old computer is not "simple office work" or something along those lines. I recorded, produced, mixed and mastered dozens of music albums, authored eight music videos for my debut album, and did everything else — blog, website design and development, bureaucracy, email, video streaming, reading, everything.

The fact that a month ago I switched to a 2013 MacBook Pro — even older! — running an operating system that was released in October of that same year, and I'm still able to do the same things as above, even better in some cases, should say something.

Pretty sure the herd mentality out there is impervious to any of these arguments.

Reply via email

Although I'm frustrated, I promise from now on to no longer use em dashes and keep my heavy italics usage to a minimum as well. I don't want anyone to think I use AI. (I mean, I do use AI to research stuff, but not to write.) It just sucks because I feel like from now on there will always be this bubbling paranoia over writing that no writer will ever be able to avoid. I'm genuinely a pro-technology, "embrace the future but let's make it better"-type of person, but I'm wary of the "new normal" this precedent sends.

But whatever. You win, AI. You can have your stupid em dashes.

No you can't have them. Yes, we can still use em dashes. And no, I’m not going to stop using them because fucking chatgpt is abusing them. What if they tweak the instructions next week and tell it to use more full stops or commas? What are we gonna do then? Stop using those as well? Hell no. I’ll keep writing however I want, and if someone decides to stop reading what I write because they suspect it’s AI-generated because I use too many em dashes, or parentheses, or any other punctuation or word or whatever, well, good riddance. I’m not gonna miss you.

Looks like I’m not the only one feeling this way.

Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome.

Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

 

As you know, for the first time since the iPhone era began, I didn’t attend the iPhone launch event. I am gutted that I didn’t get to see the new iPhone 17 devices in person. Still, I couldn’t help myself. I tweeted a bit about the event whilewatching the stream. What can I say? I still like to believe that I am the grand poohbah of the peanut gallery around Apple events. 

And when the dust settled and I had some time during the evening, I started to put together my thoughts about the event. Apple’s iPhone 17 event had only one true awe — the massive capabilities of the team behind Apple Silicon and their counterparts in engineering. 

Yes, we all know that these events are carefully staged PR shows, like fashion week for tech. Yes, they reflect the painful reality of the twilight of the smartphone era. Yes, we know that the rectangular slab that has revolutionized our lives since 2007 is on its final countdown, just like those 12-keypad phones before it.

We’re watching history rhyme — better cameras, longer battery life, new colors, thinner profiles. As someone who has covered smartphones since the concept first emerged from Nokia’s labs, the déjà vu is almost painful. (Nokia nerds, share a comment in the section below.)

I get it. Enduring design doesn’t need constant reinvention, and Apple doesn’t want to mess with a winning formula. It has worked for Porsche, and it has so far worked for Apple. You can see that engineering and chip skills can only mask the need for real reinvention for so long. The iPhone 17 lineup — with its Air, standard, Pro, and Pro Max variants — is Apple doing what it does best: polishing a form factor that has plateaued.

To argue with my own criticisms, I am also the first to appreciate the real innovation happening under the hood. That new A19 Pro chip with its desktop-class GPU capabilities, the vapor chamber cooling system borrowed from desktop engineering, the Ceramic Shield that’s now 50% tougher? This isn’t sexy stuff you can Instagram, but it’s the engineering excellence that keeps Apple ahead, for now at least, when it comes to hardware.

Apple Silicon is the Real MVP

The silicon team at Apple remains the pointy end of the spear. The A19 Pro, with its 6-core CPU and 6-core GPU featuring built-in Neural Accelerators, delivers up to 40% better sustained performance than the A18 Pro. This isn’t just another chip — it’s the foundation that makes everything else possible on the iPhone 17.

As I said on Twitter, “Apple Silicon keeping Apple relevant. Let just apps enjoy this ‘edge AI’ power. Let others build the AI. You focus on devices and chips, Apple.” Desktop-level GPU on a phone? Check. 35% better energy efficiency? Check. The computational power to run on-device AI without burning through your battery? Check and mate.

Mad science and crazy cutting-edge engineering are Apple’s actual moat. This is a company that knows how to build things well. But AI and internet software are a difficult beast for them to tame, and it’s not because they don’t have the talent. It’s because their DNA is hardware-first engineering and design. Every time I use my Vision Pro, I can’t believe that it is actually a product on the market. 

The new iPhone 17 Pro only proves that they are the only company that will spend hundreds of millions to build a new cooling gizmo for the phone.

The new internal architecture features an Apple-designed vapor chamber to enhance heat dissipation and performance. Deionized water is sealed inside the vapor chamber, which is laser-welded into the aluminum chassis to move heat away from the powerful A19 Pro, allowing it to operate at even higher performance levels. The heat is carried into the forged aluminum unibody, where it is distributed evenly through the system, managing power and surface temperatures

Most companies do vaporware. Apple does vapor chambers. 

Apple makes gigatons of money. But then it spends it well. Who else is doing this kind of wizardry in hardware at present? No one with Android margins. While others scramble to stuff Qualcomm or MediaTek chips into their devices, Apple’s vertical integration lets them build silicon that’s perfectly matched to their software ambitions. That new N1 wireless chip enabling Wi-Fi 7 and Thread? The C1X modem that’s 30% more efficient? These aren’t headline features, but they’re what make the iPhone experience feel seamless.

Battery Is The Revolution

Here’s what really impressed me but won’t make headlines: the iPhone 17 Pro Max now delivers up to 39 hours of video playback — up from 29 hours last year. That’s not just a spec bump; it’s a fundamental rethinking of power management. The combination of that vapor chamber cooling (which lets the A19 Pro run more efficiently), the larger battery made possible by the unibody design, and iOS 26’s Adaptive Power Mode that learns your usage patterns — this is systems-level engineering at its finest.

I was there for the first iPhone launch in 2007. The 1,400 milliamp-hour (mAh) battery was puny, no matter what Steve Jobs said. It was always a race from one charging outpost to another. Today, the new pretty thing, the iPhone Air can pack an estimated 3,500-3,800 mAh into an impossibly thin design and deliver all-day battery life. The iPhone of 2007 worked on 2G. Today, we’re streaming videos on 5G.

Battery is the real improvement story here. I interviewed some senior executives and chip designers at the company a few years ago, and they pointed out that because Apple makes its own chips, its own OS, and knows how its customers use the phone, it can build smarts into its products to squeeze a proverbial drop of blood from a proverbial stone, aka the battery. Looking beyond the PR, this is Apple saying that different models need different trade-offs and different engineering.

What we’re seeing is Apple solving the battery problem not through some breakthrough in battery chemistry (that’s still years away), but through obsessive optimization of every other component. The new C1X modem alone contributes to 30% better power efficiency. This kind of invisible innovation — where hundreds of small improvements compound into meaningful gains — is exactly what Apple does best and what its competitors struggle to match.

The Fully Frontal Camera

After 500 billion selfies (Apple’s count, not mine), they finally acknowledged what we all knew: the front camera is the real camera for most people.

The square sensor design on the iPhone 17 Air and the 18-megapixel Center Stage front camera across the lineup makesme wonder what took them so long. I mean, if anything, TikTok shows the world is now front camera first. Chinese phone makers know this well. From using them as tools for makeup or AI shopping, they have taken the lessons of TikTok (or its equivalent) and made front cameras not only an art form but some kind of voodoo. I think Apple has whiffed on this, but hopefully, this is the start of a new journey for them. Yes, I am excited.

The single-lens aesthetic on the Air is clean, purposeful, almost philosophical in its simplicity. With its 48MP Fusion camera system, it gives users the equivalent of four lenses – the main 28mm and 35mm focal lengths, plus an optical-quality 2x Telephoto that leverages the Photonic Engine for better details and color. This reminds me of the old Lytro camera and its computational photography capabilities. If memory serves me right, Apple bought their IP assets. 

What left me gobsmacked was that they packed all that into what Apple is calling “Camera Plateau.” Not a great name, but still a great technical achievement to really put all the brains of the phone into that small slice. Yes, I get emotional about such boring nerdy stuff. So sue me. 

Meanwhile, the Pro models with their 48MP sensors and that 8x optical zoom are doing what Apple does best: making pro-level photography accessible to amateurs who will never use half the features but love knowing they’re there.

iPhone 17 Pro and iPhone 17 Pro Max feature Appleʼs best-ever camera systems with higher-resolution sensors front and back — equivalent to having eight pro lenses in a userʼs pocket. Three 48MP Fusion cameras capture sharper and more detailed images. A new 48MP Telephoto camera has a next-generation tetraprism design with a sensor that is 56 percent larger than the previous generation to improve sharpness in bright light and bring more detail to darker shots. The new 4x optical zoom at 100mm offers a classic lens for portraiture, while the 8x optical zoom at 200mm, the longest ever on iPhone, provides longer reach and more creative choice. 

I can’t wait to put this new iPhone to use.

What irritates me? Apple’s insistence on showcasing these cameras with “pro photographers.” Give me real people taking real photos in real situations. I’ve dragged my iPhone to the ends of the earth and made magic with it, and I’m barely competent with a camera. Don’t they get that real people buy the phones for the cameras? The pros just want freebies and move on to the next Pixel or whatever.

Look Ma, No AI 

Notice what Apple didn’t do? They didn’t spend the entire event breathlessly hyping “AI” like every other tech company. This is good, Apple: do what you know best. Let others pioneer the technology, then mainstream it when it’s ready for normal humans. 

And that is why the company needs to go back to its old playbook. Just as Apple lets Google handle search and pays them for it, why not let the big players in AI do their thing? Just protect our identity, data, and privacy, and act as an intermediary between us and the AI companies. Charge them a premium. Trust me, they would want access to all your customers.

My Final Word

Here’s what this event really told us:

1. Orange iPhone Pro — we’ve come a long way from 2007’s single color option.
2. The engineering team remains “G” (as we old-timers say) — that vapor chamber cooling is legitimately impressive.
3. Apple Silicon continues to be the engine that matters — everything interesting flows from chip innovation.
4. Minimal AI talk was smart — under-promise, over-deliver.
5. The iPhone Air will sell like hotcakes — thin and light always wins.
6. Apple’s renewed focus on accessories — Apple is introducing new TechWoven cases, Crossbody Straps, and MagSafe external batteries. My bet is that they need to boost the revenue stream with sales of accessories, insteadof letting third-party accessory makers walk off into the sunset. 
7. Which iPhone 17 will I buy? — I’m sticking with the Pro Max. I will go for the Blue model. I am a “blue” kinda guy. Just peek at my collection of blue inks. It’s a form factor I like and feel gives me everything I need.

The smartphone as we know it may have about five years left in this form factor. No one, including Apple, wants to upset the apple cart (pun intended). But while everyone else is trying to figure out what comes next, Apple is pushing the current paradigm as far as engineering allows. That’s not sexy, but it’s smart.

It’s not revolutionary, but it is excellent engineering. And in a world where everyone else is chasing AI chatbots and foldable gimmicks, there’s something reassuring about Apple’s relentless focus on making the rectangle in your pocket a little bit better year after year.

Even if that rectangle is fundamentally the same shape it’s been since 2007. Sort of like a Porsche from the 1950s looks vaguely like the latest EV rolling off their factory floor. 

And yet, I am craving something new. Not a foldable phone. Not a skinnier phone. But an un-phone that sparks a new revolution, like the iPhone did by reimagining the phone. I want Apple’s chip, engineering, and design teams to dream up a new future and show the world that it is doable, without Steve Jobs and without Jony Ive’s baritone saying — “aluminum.”