/reader

And including all might mean going a bit slower.

Human collaboration may seem less “efficient” than handing the work over entirely to the machines.

But inefficiency may be the cost of collaborating with humans, rather than extracting an output from a machine. We gain not only from their judgment and expertise in a particular discipline, but from the relationship, trust, and shared understanding that blossoms from making something together.

As the old proverb says: “If you want to go fast, go alone. If you want to go far, go together.”

Reformulated for today: If you want to go fast, go with the LLM. If you want to go far, go with your fellow humans.

Reply via: Email · Mastodon · Bluesky

Then there’s the lovely lussebulle season, and it’s just started. A bit too early, to be honest. Traditionally, it runs from late November.

That’s the thing with most traditions these days, isn’t it? It feels like they’re getting stretched each year. In a few years, we’ll take midsommarstången down on the same day as we put up the Christmas tree. Or maybe it’s just me getting old...

Anyway, today I got my hands on this season’s first lussebulle, also known as lussekatt (Lucia cat). It’s a tasty, sweet saffron-flavored bun, shaped like a reversed S and decorated with raisins.

A common misunderstanding is that the shape is meant to resemble a cat’s tail, hence the “Lucia cat” name. The truth is that it’s a sun symbol, believed to keep evil spirits away and invite the return of the light during the dark season.

So, hopefully I’m safe now with this yummy in my tummy:

 

Yes, I still call it Twitter. Mostly because I am old and set in my ways, but also because I have spent what feels like most of my life on there — certainly a large portion of my professional life — and for the vast majority of that time it was called Twitter. I also think that X is a pretty stupid name. To be fair, Twitter was a pretty stupid name as well (and here you can picture me trying to tell senior executives of the newspaper where I worked in 2008 that they should "tweet"). But it's one that a lot of us got used to, so for the rest of this essay I will be calling it Twitter, just to be ornery. In any case, after it was acquired by Elon Musk in 2022, there seemed to be a kind of exodus from Twitter to a variety of apps such as Bluesky — initially a skunkworks started inside Twitter — and Threads, which began as a side project at Instagram, and Mastodon and other similar apps that are part of a loose grouping of open-source apps some call the "fediverse." I have an account on all of these services, and I still check them all from time to time, but my impression is that momentum seems to have shifted back to Twitter.

The extent of this shift is difficult to quantify, in part because there is no real objective source of user numbers for any of those apps (save perhaps Mastodon) and the ones that we get from the companies themselves — especially from Musk, not surprisingly — are suspect. For example, Meta says that Threads has 500 million average users, and yet my own use of the app makes me suspicious of that number. I think a lot of those "users" have an account and maybe it opens in their browser or on their phone but they rarely post anything. This is part of the problem with counting users of any kind, whether it's people loading a website or people opening an app. What counts as a user? If I have the Threads app on my phone but never look at it, am I a user? Lots of services talk about "monthly active users" — so some are only active once in a month? Great social network you've got there. For me at least, user should mean someone who interacts with the app in a significant way, preferably by posting or reposting regularly.

Elon says that Twitter got 513 billion "user seconds" in a day earlier this year, whatever that means (it's a private company so he can more or less say whatever he wants). Bluesky was last reported to have about 47 million users, according to one estimate. Again, these numbers likely mean someone installed the app or connected to a server, but they say nothing about how often they use it. So what we are left with is vibes. And the vibe feels like people are returning to Twitter, or using it more than they used to. Anecdotal evidence isn't worth the paper it is printed on, but it does seem to be piling up. The first person I came across who admitted that they were "slinking back to X," was Casey Newton, who writes a newsletter called Platformer and also co-hosts a podcast with Kevin Roose, a former writer for the New York Times. Here's how Casey described his decision to spend more time on X after abandoning it earlier:

Mostly I left because I could not stand the thought of being there. I also hoped that I could use whatever minor influence I had to help kick-start new platforms. I encouraged Meta executives to challenge X with a Twitter clone, and have used Threads daily since it launched. I covered the launch of Bluesky closely and have continued to pour energy into it (and the Fediverse) even as they decline. While Musk was suing OpenAI in an effort to effectively destroy it, I repeatedly told Sam Altman to start a rival to X and take his AI posting there. Whatever virtue these actions may have had, they did not succeed at creating a true rival to X in the category that matters most to me: a forum for daily tech and business conversation. The community of people working in and around artificial intelligence product and policy simply refuses to move away from X.

At the risk of copying Casey, that's a pretty fair summation of my approach to Twitter and its would-be rivals over the past few years. I moved away from Twitter when it became X in part because Musk made it obvious that his idea of moving the platform towards an embrace of "free speech" meant allowing racists and homophobes and others free reign to spout whatever malicious nonsense they wanted to. Not only that, but his monetization strategy (and I hesitate to use the word "strategy" in this case, since that usually means something that was planned with careful thought) involved giving these toxic blowhards and mouth-breathers checkmarks as a sign of "verification" and then compensating them for how much rage-bait they could post in a day. Even his AI model, Grok, wound up openly admiring Hitler and spewing other garbage views before he reigned it in — and is now used to create deepfake porn and other offensive content. In other words, X was a train wreck in which every car is a dumpster on fire.

Note: In case you are a first-time reader, or you forgot that you signed up for this newsletter, this is The Torment Nexus. Thanks for reading! You can find out more about me and this newsletter in this post. This newsletter survives solely on your contributions, so please sign up for a paying subscription or visit my Patreon, which you can find here. I also publish a daily email newsletter of odd or interesting links called When The Going Gets Weird, which is here.

Ghost towns

In light of all that, I was encouraged when Bluesky launched, especially when it said it would be open and decentralized (although that ended up being more theoretical than real, as I wrote here in 2024). The user base grew rapidly, to the point where it had more than 20 million users at the time of that post in 2024. A recent estimate put it at 47 million (with all the above caveats about what that might mean usage-wise). So the network appears to have grown significantly, and yet it is still a rounding error when compared with Threads and Twitter. Is that a bad thing? Not at all. Mastodon has several orders of magnitude fewer users even than Bluesky, and yet I get value out of it. But if you want a social network where you can see content from a wide spectrum of users, neither one of those is going to cut it. Bluesky has often been accused of being a left-wing echo chamber, and to a large extent that is accurate (in my usage at least). That's great if that's what you are looking for! But it is not enough for many.

Casey put his finger on the main problem: if you are interested in the growth of artificial intelligence (or whatever Trump is forcing people to call it now) and the risks and potential benefits and what they say about the nature of consciousness — which I very much am — then Bluesky and Threads and Mastodon are just not going to cut it. All of the leaders of this multi-trillion-dollar industry in the making, whether it's Sam Altman of OpenAI or Dario Amodei and Jack Clark of Anthropic, or some of the leading scientists behind Google's DeepMind, are posting on Twitter. Not only that, but some of the industry's most prominent skeptics and critics are there as well. And they aren't just posting the occasional quip now and then — many of them are posting long and thoughtful comments about what is happening as it happens, whether it's the Hugging Face hack or the recent news that some of Anthropic's new models might be able to replicate themselves using any internet-connected device rather than a data centre.

For someone like me, or Casey, that is irresistible from a news consumption point of view. By the time these topics hit the mainstream news, it is hours or even days later, and there is never the breadth of commentary that Twitter brings. Substack is a close second (and of course it also has its problematic aspects as well, many of which are very similar to Twitter's — platforming racists and transphobes, for example). But even there, you get one or two founders or senior executives and maybe one knowledgeable critic (Gary Marcus, of course, who makes a point of trying to spread his criticisms far and wide). That's not enough to make it worthwhile, at least not for me. Here's another excerpt from Casey's thoughts on his return to Twitter, which I also share:

I am among those who believe that the next year will be decisive in shaping the future of AI policy, regulation, and safety. And increasingly, attempting to influence the AI policy conversation without participating on X (or Substack) has made me feel like I am fighting with both hands tied behind my back. And so, in the coming days, I plan to resume posting on X. I am doing so not because I think it’s any better — it isn’t — but because I have exhausted all of the alternatives. I continue to believe that anyone who can avoid posting on X should. But my calculus about the t.radeoffs involved for my own work has shifted: as the stakes of the AI conversation have risen, boycotting X over my disagreements with management has grown both more costly and less effective. Should the AI crowd ever move elsewhere, I will happily follow them. But I’ve become convinced that it’s important I engage with them, even if doing so makes me feel like I’m coworking inside a Port-a-Potty.

I want to make it clear that I don't enjoy being associated with either Musk or his platform, and if there was any other way around it, I would gladly take it. And I think it's important to reiterate that being on Twitter is not about consuming unfiltered boosterism from Altman and Amodei and the rest — for me, the skepticism and criticism are as important, if not more so, and I have not been able to find anywhere near as much. I'm talking about people like Yann LeCun, who is one of the pioneers of neural networking research along with Geoffrey Hinton, and Yoshua Bengio, who is now at the University of Montreal. Then there's Fei-Fei Li, another pioneer who (like LeCun) thinks traditional LLMs are flawed and that they need to build or be trained on a "world model" to understand how physical objects (including people) move and behave. There's also Wharton professor Ethan Mollick and OpenAI cofounder Andrej Karpathy.

Not proud of it

It could be that, like Casey, I am what Today In Tabs author Rusty Foster calls a "culty dimwit" for returning to Twitter, but I have plenty of company (and its not the first time I have parted company with Rusty, whose work I have always enjoyed — even when he is wrong about something, as I think he was about using AI tools for writing). The second person I saw writing about a return to Twitter after Casey was Apple blogger extraordinaire John Gruber of Daring Fireball in a post just a few days ago titled X Once Again Marks The Spot. In a similar vein to Casey Newton and my arguments about how its difficult to follow AI without being on Twitter, Gruber notes that there are senior Apple executives — including incoming CEO John Ternus — who are only posting about their work and their thoughts on Twitter, meaning anyone (like John) who wants the unfiltered view of what these individuals are thinking needs to be there.

Upon taking the CEO helm last month, John Ternus began tweeting on X. He tweeted “hello”, posted an iPhone event eve teaser and then a promo video for the new products, celebrated Apple’s plethora of wins at the Emmys and launch day on Fifth Avenue, and commemorated the anniversary of Steve Jobs’s death. X is the only place these posts go. Same for Greg Joswiak’s account. Lighthearted stuff too, like Cook “introducing” Ternus to Pikachu back in August. You may not like it that X has re-found its footing under Elon Musk’s ownership, but it has. I’m citing Apple executives here but they’re far from alone. There are hundreds of interesting people and accounts I follow that post on X very regularly and do not post anywhere else at all. As a word nerd I love Merriam-Webster’s account — fun, clever, smart posts every day. That’s just one example among hundreds. Fascinating new apps are being shown and discussed on X and nowhere else.

Gruber writes that he sees "more interesting posts on X than I do on Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon combined. I wish that weren’t so but it is." I also wish that wasn't the case, but I have to agree. And his views on Threads struck a nerve too: he says that Threads’s algorithm is "weirder than X’s now, and the content I see there is relatively boring. My Threads timeline is full of engagement bait without being engaging." I regularly go open the app after a few days of not being there and see some kind of engagement bait, which makes sense given my absence, but when I refresh the page or the stream, I still see that same post, even if it's several days old by that point, rather than something interesting from some of the hundreds of accounts I follow. This is irritating, to say the least, and it makes me feel like Threads cares more about raw engagement than about serving its actual regular users — which for a product that came from the same company that gave us Facebook and Instagram is hardly surprising at all. Here's Gruber again:

Bluesky and Mastodon are too small for most people to care about — and, worse, they are the networks where politics are, in my experience, unavoidable. You can have a discussion about cool new use cases and tools for AI on X and people just discuss the tools and use cases. On Bluesky and Mastodon it’s difficult to have such discussions without arguments from people who (a) believe all use of AI is unethical, and (b) will shove their viewpoints into your replies. The culture on X today is remarkably friendly and inclusive. It is a cheerful place. That cheerfulness is another differentiator. If you believe the world is falling apart and doomed only to get worse, that our obvious and real problems cannot be surmounted, X is not the platform for you.

I don't know about the cheerfulness of Twitter, but the unrelenting negativity I see on Bluesky does get tiring, even if there is plenty that we should be critical of, including almost everything Trump says or does. Threads seems like a kind of zombie social network, where there are allegedly hundreds of millions of users, and yet you only see and hear from a tiny, tiny subset of that number, and in most cases it's a brand posting a generic comment. That's not my idea of a great time — and it's worth noting that when Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg wanted to make a funny comment about his appearance on a beer-and-programming podcast, he used his @finkd Twitter account and not his Threads one. I admire Anil Dash, and I respect his commitment to his principles that Twitter/X and Substack are bad and we shouldn't support them with our clicks. But I have work to do, and there is literally no other way that I can get the access to the leading thinkers but to be on Twitter, even if it means holding my nose while I do so.

If you liked this newsletter (even if you didn't agree with it) please consider upgrading to a paid subscription, or donating through my Patreon. Got any thoughts or comments? Feel free to either leave them here, or post them on Substack or on my website, or you can also reach me on Twitter, Threads, BlueSky or Mastodon. And thanks for being a reader.

Me: “Wait, if they can both see the whole game and every possible move how does anyone ever win? Why doesn’t every game end in a draw?”

Him: “Ah, that’s easy. It’s the move they forgot to consider. They are so busy seeing everything they missed something. They can’t escape the fact they’re human”

I think about this conversation often these days.

 

I swear if I hear the word "slop" one more time I'm going to punch someone in the throat.

I just did a nice and thorough de-cluttering of my office and I feel much better.

I'm tightening my requirements for people I follow. Their contribute-to-complain ratio needs to tend toward ∞.

I've started eating meals sitting at my kitchen table with no devices nearby. Sometimes I'll have a book open, but otherwise it's just me and the world. Food tastes better this way.

✍️ Reply by email

It's been over a week now, but I still haven't found my way out of this TV/movie-watching slump. Sure, I've managed to watch a few things, but I'm SO not interested. In the past, this would stress me out. I'd feel like I was wasting my free time because I couldn't relax without watching TV. And worse, as discussed previously in regard to Halloween, I'd be even more stressed because I should be catching up on horror movies and TV shows. You know, consume, consume, consume... now where have I seen that before?

Ha, just kidding. This is not a long-winded post about how They Live is still relevant, if not more so in 2026. I mean, it is, but yeah...

No, this post is about accepting that sometimes you just need something new and different. Sometimes you need to unplug and find another way to relax.

I think one of the problems with having so much entertainment available is that I've forgotten what it's like to be bored. Growing up, there were only so many channels on television, and if nothing was on, well, you found something else to do. You didn't have thousands of movies and TV shows waiting for you at the press of a button. You either watched what was available or moved on with your day.

Now, I can spend an entire evening browsing through more entertainment than I could possibly consume in a lifetime, and somehow still feel like there's nothing worth watching. It's a strange problem to have.

I've also begun to wonder when my hobbies became something I felt like I needed to keep up with. I have lists of movies I want to watch, games I want to play, and books I want to read. All things I genuinely enjoy, but sometimes those lists start feeling more like chores than opportunities to have fun.

Maybe that's part of the problem. I've spent so much time thinking about what I want to watch next that I've forgotten there's nothing wrong with watching nothing at all.

Something I've recently stumbled across is listening to some light '40s jazz. There's something about it that's soothing, and I guess, in a way, I feel like I'm sitting on the front porch of a rusted house following a nuclear fallout, sipping on some Nuka-Cola and watching two-headed dogs run by.

And you know what? I'm enjoying it.

There's something nice about sitting around with some music playing in the background and not feeling the need to do anything else. No plot to follow, no episodes to finish, and no list to check something off of. Just some music and whatever happens to be running through my mind.

I've spent so much of my life enjoying fictional worlds through television, movies, books, and video games that sometimes I forget my imagination can be entertaining all on its own. I don't always need a screen in front of me to escape for a little while.

And maybe that's what I've been missing. Not another television show or movie, but the opportunity to let my mind wander without needing something on a screen to guide it.

I'm not suggesting there's anything wrong with watching TV or spending an evening playing video games. Heck, I'll probably be doing both again before the week is over. But I do think there's something to be said for recognizing when you're no longer enjoying something and giving yourself permission to walk away from it for a while.

Instead of thinking something is wrong with me because I'm not enjoying TV right now, I'm realizing that maybe this is just my brain's way of telling me I need to disconnect for a bit. I don't need to find another show to binge or another movie to add to my watchlist. Sometimes it's enough to sit around, listen to some music, and enjoy the moment.

Those TV shows will still be there when I'm ready, and I've already accepted there's no way I can watch it all, so what's the rush?

/pfp is a new one, and I've got mine here! I'm not sure this particular standard will ever reach the status of being truly well-known or widely-used, but I like it as a concept. /pfp is an archive of the "profile pictures" you've used over the years, chronologically-arranged.

As such, it acts as sort of a time capsule and sort of a timeline of how I've "presented" myself online over the decades.

I think it's interesting that I started with photos, switched to a comic representation, returned to photos... and now I've drifted back to a (better-drawn) comic representation again. I don't have a full explanation for that, just ideas²... it's something that just "felt right" at each point I guess.

Footnotes

¹ The idea of slashpages that they're well-known URLs on personal websites that paint a picture of who the site owner is and what they're about. A popular one that I don't yet have is /now: a place to talk about "what you're up to right now". (I've got plenty of others though.)

² Ideas like: gosh, I'm not as pretty as I used to be, am I? Maybe if I used a cartoon version of myself I could not-draw the age lines. 🤭

❤️‍🔥 You're reading this post via the RSS feed. You're on fire! 🔥