Page 1 of 14
>     >>

Don’t quit blogging for the wrong reasons

 There’s never been a shortage of posts about quitting blogging in the blogging community. I’ve contributed a few myself over the years.

It’s been a while since I last did it, so it’s hard to remember what the explanation was. Probably something that sounded wise and understandable at the time.

But was it the right reason? Was it really true?

I don’t know, but I honestly think it wasn’t.

Even though I haven’t actually gone through with it lately, the thoughts of quitting still pop up every now and then. Instead of acting on them, I’ve started trying to understand why they show up in the first place.

It always starts with something that sounds true to me. “I want to spend less time online. I want to focus on other things. I’ve enjoyed blogging, but it’s time for a change.”

Hard to argue with that, if it’s honest. But when I stay with those thoughts instead of acting on them, a different story slowly appears.

The embarrassing truth is that underneath that shiny armor of reasoning, this is what’s really going on. “I spend all this time writing, creating, and sharing. For what? Does anyone even care? Why bother continuing?”

That’s the sad soundtrack playing in the background. That’s the need for validation hiding behind something that sounds reasonable.

It’s a lie.

Yes, I do spend time writing, creating, and sharing. But I do it because I love it, not to be recognized or to make a living from it.

And I know that at least some people care. I see it in wonderful emails, lovely guestbook comments, and links from other bloggers. Thank you.

If you ever find yourself thinking about quitting blogging, don’t reach for the delete button right away. Stay with the idea for a while. Sit with it for a day, a week, or however long it takes to find the honest answer.

Just don’t quit blogging for the wrong reasons.

Robert Birming

08 Feb 2026 at 09:57

Blogging As Self-Care

 It’s a timeworn and tired tradition that bloggers love to blog about blogging. So much so that if any particular blogger has done an especially large amount of it, there’s probably some degree of repetition involved—even more especially if they’ve also been blogging for an extraordinarily long time. I’ve alluded to this in the past, but blogging for me is a self-regulatory activity, and I wanted to dig a little more into that.

What prompted this hopefully at least somewhat deeper revisit was something Peige said on the subject of blogging.

I continue to customize my blog to my heart's content. I spend a lot of time poking around my site and enjoy creating moments of delight for myself. I used to write twice a month on Substack, but here, I write almost every day, and if it's not a blog post, I'm doing something else, like editing the theme or adding a new page to my About section.

Self-gratuitous? Probably. But as someone who's struggled to love themselves, I see this as an act of self-care. I've created a space where my words, my thoughts, and my ideas matter. They might not matter to you, but they matter to ME. And that's more than enough reason to write about it.

Here’s where I want to turn, even if it seems suddenly so, to some previous discussions of autistic burnout, specifically that paper about resources and demands from four years ago.

For example, depleted energy (resource) may prevent an autistic individual engaging with their special interests (resource) which could, in turn, reduce their mental wellbeing (resource). Additionally, the effort associated with acquiring and maintaining some resources can outweigh their protective, buffering effect.

My example at the time about how this is true for me were my trips to Oregon Zoo, because “such a trip isn’t always some sort of balm for burnout due to the accumulated stressors (demands) of taking public transit across town, the effort of walking around the zoo and being among so many other people, and taking public transit across town again”. The problem with autistic burnout is that it’s often the case that even your self-regulatory behaviors can’t save you from it, and in some cases can make it even worse.

While it’s true that I did blog during my months-long autistic burnout which finally only let up after I insisted upon a three-week break from any demands beyond my own daily maintenance, very little of it was particularly high-effort writing, whereas come January my cognitive effort was more pronounced and my output skyrocketed.

Much of my blogging plays a role similar to how my therapy sessions are structured, in that methodically having to lay out what’s happening and what I think about what’s happening is a way of externalizing the internal in order better to examine and understand it. It’s innately a self-regulating behavior. One that becomes at least somewhat destabilized and pronouncedly unavailable to me when in autistic burnout, because if the burnout is deep enough it literally hurts to think, in a way that’s impossible for me to describe but if you know, you know.

(It’s unclear to me whether or not writing would be considered self-regulatory in precisely such a way so as to qualify it as stimming, defined on Wikipedia as “the repetition of physical movements, sounds, words, moving objects, or other behaviors”. There’s a line somewhere between self-regulation and self-stimulation, wherein the latter is a form of the former but the former doesn’t necessarily mean the latter.)

I’ve said before that I write when I can’t not write, which is why needing to write but being unable to do so because of autistic burnout is such an intensely unpleasant aspect to the whole thing. That certainly seems to mark my writing as self-care. Not being able to truly, properly exert the energy needed to engage in an activity that under more usual circumstances is restorative in the long-haul even if it’s using up resources in the near-term moment is frustrating to say the least.

Winnie speaks of learning to take care of oneself in ways that highlight what Peige, is addressing, arguing that this includes “the way we interact with our selves internally”.

It may seem narcissistic to write so extensively on my self, but I have learnt that until we learn to manage our own internal environment we will always be unconsciously harming others. We are like an instrument, we will keep playing broken music to other people if we are broken. That said I think every one is broken in their own way, and I think the point is not to have a mindset that we have to be fixed, but rather we have to understand our own qualities and quirks – just like Keith Jarrett leveraging on the qualities of a broken piano – so that we can carry more aliveness and live more thoroughly. Without that self-awareness we are unknowingly being discordant to our selves, and without internal harmony it is difficult to engage with the world meaningfully.

It’s just that for many of us, “the way we interact with our selves internally” is something we perform publicly where other people can see it. In a way somewhat similar to how the weeknotes we use to structure my therapy sessions would not have the impact they do without talking through them out loud in-session, I don’t think I would make as much sense of the “internal environment that surrounds [my] psyche” (in Winnie’s words) were I just to keep all of these words to myself.

Whatever the case for my selves of the past—as we slowly will see over the course of the blog restoration project—this present me can’t even conceive of how to navigate the inner and the outer worlds absent writing to myself, and thinking out loud, in public. I’m thinking now, as I wrap up, of what I discovered about ego as a result of hosting IndieWeb Carnvial last October: that it is a mediator between and amongst out instinctual needs, our internalized norms, our external reality.

If ego is the drive to balance these things, than it is ego in that sense which makes me write, no matter whether anyone else directly gets anything out of it, because they do get something out of it indirectly. Winnie says it: “without internal harmony it is difficult to engage with the world meaningfully”.

So, to Winnie I’d say that none of this is narcissistic, and to Peige that none of it is self-gratuitous. It simply is all of us writing toward self-belief.


Reply by emailTip $1/month • Thank you for using RSS

Bix Dot Blog

08 Feb 2026 at 00:57
#

Really happy with the new full-screen post editor that we’ve been working on. It’ll ship on Monday. I think it solves multiple problems at once: sort of a distraction-free mode for writing, and more control over the accessory panes like categories and cross-posting.

Manton Reece

07 Feb 2026 at 23:11

A drive around Amish country

 

Rachel and I drove around the Amish settlement in Daviess County today and came across this guy spreading manure. (Poor quality, I know.) It was still cold today but the strong sunshine felt like a promise.

After looking around the Odon Locker, we walked across the parking lot to a shop with a sign saying something about Amish goods, with the requisite buggy image. Turned out to be one of those faux Amish shops meant for tourists and church ladies. There’s a certain style of religious kitsch that you always find in these places. Signs made to look hand-lettered that say things like “gather” or “it is well with my soul.” Cookbooks with pictures that are typically described as “quaint.” A little section for the men with beard balm displays and shirts that say “Man of God.” You know that “wine mom” aesthetic you see at wineries? This is the evangelical version of that. We took one step inside the shop, looked at each other, and walked back out.

We visited more genuinely Amish/Mennonite stores in the country south of Odon. Groceries stores and variety shops and a shoe store that sells so much more than shoes. You can tell these places are meant to be the sort of place that sells everything one of the plain folk might need: groceries and bulk goods, herbal remedies, and copies of Ausbund, Luther’s German Bible, Rules of a Godly Life, and Raber’s Almanac.

The kitsch shops are frustrating because they represent that malignant power of the marketers to sell you the form of godliness while denying the power thereof. It’s fashion for those whose values run skin-deep.

The more substantial lesson we can learn from the Amish is the power of life under vow. I’ve been considering this a lot lately because it is a hard lesson, and one I’m not quite sure what to do with yet. Thankfully, it is neither marketable nor available for sale.

jabel

07 Feb 2026 at 23:10

Data center pause

 Wired reporting on a proposed bill to pause building data centers in New York for three years:

Two New York lawmakers on Friday announced that they are introducing a bill that would impose a three-year moratorium on data center development. The announcement makes New York at least the sixth state to introduce legislation putting a pause on data center development in the past few weeks—one of the latest signs of a growing and bipartisan backlash that is quickly finding traction in statehouses around the country.

I'm sure the AI backlash will intensify. I've written before about how AI will become a massive cultural divide. People feel very strongly about this and we shouldn't brush that aside as if it doesn't matter.

But three years is forever. I'd rather see new legislation that adds incentives for renewable energy or limits on how construction and noise affect communities. Data centers are going to be built. If New York blocks them, they will be built elsewhere. Texas has a lot of space for solar and wind farms.

The AI industry has an insane amount of money right now. It won't always be like that. This might be a once-a-generation opportunity to funnel that money into clean energy and new infrastructure.

Manton Reece

07 Feb 2026 at 22:41
#

I've noticed over the last couple of years that my shorter posts are often too tightly edited to come across clearly. My short blog posts from twenty years ago might've been better. Going to try to write more slightly long-form posts... Not really full essays, just a couple paragraphs.

Manton Reece

07 Feb 2026 at 20:59

Read the code

 I've seen a few posts recently about how developers will increasingly not even read the code that AI generates for them. Most famously, a blog post from Peter Steinberger:

These days I don’t read much code anymore. I watch the stream and sometimes look at key parts, but I gotta be honest - most code I don’t read.

Peter also posted a photo on Twitter / X that I think is real, although there have been AI-generated joke spin-offs of it, adding more and more monitors. In the real photo, Peter has a ridiculous number of terminal windows open as he juggles many concurrent OpenAI Codex sessions. Extreme multitasking.

I read everything AI helps me with. Sometimes I edit it. It hardly takes any time to skim through code to understand what it's doing. It would be challenging to design and keep improving an app without having the basic architecture and some of the details in your head.

In a Mastodon thread, Steve Troughton-Smith compared AI-generated code with compiler-generated code:

Much as you don't generally go auditing the bytecode or intermediate representation generated by your compiler, I think the idea of manually reviewing LLM-written code will fall by the wayside too. Like it or not, these agents are the new compilers, and prompting them is the new programming.

I enjoyed Steve's posts exploring Xcode 26.3. But compilers are deterministic. When you input C, you can be confident that the machine code it eventually spits out is correct. Decades ago developers might need to drop down to assembly language to optimize something. The compiler is just never going to go off in the weeds and make decisions about the design or structure of your app in the way that LLMs do.

This blog post from Matt Birchler is more my take:

If you don't know what tech stack you're using or why things work in the first place, then if things go wrong and the computer isn't able to fix it for you, then you're in a sticky situation.

And this is why I think that skilled developers, while they may not be writing every single line of code in the future, they will still bring value by understanding systems.

As I blogged last night, successful developers will now need to focus even more on other aspects of their business. Writing and reviewing code is still going to be part of the job for the foreseeable future.

Manton Reece

07 Feb 2026 at 20:06

Step aside, phone

 

I was chatting with Kevin earlier today, and since he’s unhappy with his mindless phone usage, I proposed a challenge to him: for the next 4 weeks, each Sunday, we’re gonna publish screenshots of our screen time usage as well as some reflections and notes on how the week went. If you also want to cut down on some of your phone usage, feel free to join in; I’ll be happy to include links to your posts.

I experimented with phone usage in the past and I know that I can push screen time usage very low, but it’s always nice to do these types of challenges, especially when done to help someone else.

Like Kevin, I’m also trying to read more. I read 35 books last year, the goal for 2026 is to read 36 (currently more than halfway through book number 5), and so I’m gonna attempt to spend more time reading on paper and less on screen. It’s gonna be fun, curious to see how low I can push my daily averages this time around.


Thank you for keeping RSS alive. You're awesome.

Email me :: Sign my guestbook :: Support for 1$/month :: See my generous supporters :: Subscribe to People and Blogs

Manu's Feed

07 Feb 2026 at 18:00

Bookstores, Not Amazon

 I haven't bought a book from Amazon in a couple years. Long ago, I was so excited that Amazon had pretty much any book I might want. My excitement gave way as bookstores closed. Turns out, hunting for books is more enjoyable than having them all at my fingertips.

I don't buy much of anything from Amazon. Its founder is repugnant, its business model is odious, and its part of a poisonous tech culture. In 2025, I made three Amazon purchases. I plan on never going back.

Last month, we switched from a decades-old Amazon credit card to one unaffiliated with Amazon that provides better benefits.

Amazon's cool Rivian trucks still deliver daily in our neighborhood, but not at our house.

The last book I bought was used. I buy new books by authors I love, getting them locally at independent shops and Barnes & Noble.

Long ago, Amazon was focused on being the best bookstore. Now, they're concerned more with licking the fascist dictator's boots, producing puff pieces about the dicatator's third wife.

I don't want to associate with that. I'll shop elsewhere.

bgfay

07 Feb 2026 at 17:55
>     >>



Refresh complete

ReloadX
Home
All feeds

Last 24 hours
Download OPML
*
Annie
*
Articles – Dan Q
*
Baty.net posts
*
bgfay
*
Bix Dot Blog
Brandon's Journal
Chris McLeod's blog — Blog Posts — RSS Feed
*
Colin Devroe
*
Colin Walker – Daily Feed
Content on Kwon.nyc
Crazy Stupid Tech
*
daverupert.com
Dealgorithmed
Human Stuff from Lisa Olivera
*
jabel
James Van Dyne
*
Jim Nielsen's Blog
Jo's Blog
*
Kev Quirk
*
Manton Reece
*
Manu's Feed
*
Notes – Dan Q
*
On my Om
*
QC RSS
rebecca toh's untitled project
*
Rhoneisms
*
Robert Birming
*
Scripting News for email
*
Simon Collison | Articles & Stream
strandlines
*
Terry Godier
*
The Torment Nexus
*
thejaymo
*
Westenberg.

About Reader


Reader is a public/private RSS & Atom feed reader.


The page is publicly available but all admin and post actions are gated behind login checks. Anyone is welcome to come and have a look at what feeds are listed — the posts visible will be everything within the last week and be unaffected by my read/unread status.


Reader currently updates every six hours.


Close

Search




x
Colin Walker Colin Walker colin@colinwalker.blog